Opened 4 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#25183 closed defect (fixed)
Bug in the associahedron object
Reported by:  jipilab  Owned by:  

Priority:  major  Milestone:  sage9.0 
Component:  geometry  Keywords:  associahedron 
Cc:  chapoton, stumpc5, tscrim, moritz, jipilab, ghLaisRast  Merged in:  
Authors:  Jonathan Kliem  Reviewers:  JeanPhilippe Labbé, Travis Scrimshaw 
Report Upstream:  N/A  Work issues:  
Branch:  d9083b7 (Commits, GitHub, GitLab)  Commit:  d9083b70195aafacf95eb991e21099136101ce3d 
Dependencies:  #27798  Stopgaps: 
Description (last modified by )
The following lines currently occur:
sage: A = polytopes.associahedron(['A',3]) sage: face = A.faces(2)[3] sage: face <6,8,9,10> sage: face.as_polyhedron() /home/jplabbe/sage/local/lib/python2.7/sitepackages/sage/repl/rich_output/display_manager.py:590: RichReprWarning: Exception in _rich_repr_ while displaying object: 'Associahedra_with_category.element_class' object has no attribute '_cartan_type' RichReprWarning, <repr(<sage.combinat.root_system.associahedron.Associahedra_with_category.element_class at 0x7f48d0d7ad70>) failed: AttributeError: 'Associahedra_with_category.element_class' object has no attribute '_cartan_type'>
The construction as_polyhedron
initializes the new (face)polyhedron via P.__class__(parent, Vrep, None)
. In the case of the associahedron, this does not give a valid object, as the associahedron requires a cartan type as well.
Same (or similar problem) with:
minkowski_sum
,minkowski_difference
,translation
,dilation
,convex_hull
,intersection
(actually even worse as coercion fails),polar
.
We fix the initialization of the associahedron to now require the cartan type on __init__
(before it was assumed to be set after initialization).
Further we have __new__
return the correct parent class such that e.g. the face of an Associahedron_class_ppl
is constructed as Polyhedron_ppl
.
We fix _coerce_map_from_
to take into account that no general polyhedron can be coerced to an associahedron.
We manually set the correct pushout of polyhedra over ZZ and associahedra (over QQ) to be polyhedra over QQ.
Change History (17)
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by
 Cc moritz added
comment:2 Changed 2 years ago by
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by
 Branch set to public/25183
 Commit set to 65b11c9de95bb2ecde90c722ca2e9781fdac7cc5
 Dependencies set to 27798
 Description modified (diff)
 Status changed from new to needs_review
This branch should fix the bug.
Feel free to change it, alter it, abonden it, etc.
Maybe there is a better way to obtain the correct parent, i.e. improve the following lines:
156 for typ1 in ancestors_of_associahedron: 157 if typ1 in mro: 158 return typ1(parent, Vrep, Hrep, **kwds)
New commits:
2643078  added `backend` to associahedron and flow polytope

a9b4826  typo

8716985  corrected docstring

b873156  associahedron actually uses the claimed backend now

1f4bb25  comments by tscrim

2c812c5  should have fixed bug in #25183

65b11c9  removed redundant line

comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by
 Dependencies changed from 27798 to #27798
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage8.2 to sage8.9
comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by
 Status changed from needs_review to needs_work
Once #27798 is done, I'm going to rebase it and solve the merge conflict. At the moment it seems pointless to me.
comment:7 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
comment:8 Changed 2 years ago by
 Commit changed from 65b11c9de95bb2ecde90c722ca2e9781fdac7cc5 to 0e892e7019001400faf0c3cfed542fffd3ac7227
comment:9 Changed 2 years ago by
 Description modified (diff)
 Status changed from needs_work to needs_review
comment:10 Changed 2 years ago by
I think I got things fixed now. Suggestions for better solutions are welcome.
comment:11 Changed 2 years ago by
 Cc jipilab ghLaisRast added
comment:12 Changed 2 years ago by
 Reviewers set to JeanPhilippe Labbé
That looks good to me. Might be good to have some feedback from Travis or Frédéric on the cartan side of things, if they are done properly.
I would put this to positive review since the error appears to be fixed.
comment:13 Changed 2 years ago by
I don't have any comments on the Cartan side as you are not really doing anything with them. However, I do have one comment about this code block:
for typ1 in ancestors_of_associahedron: if typ1 in mro: return typ1(parent, Vrep, Hrep, **kwds)
My understanding is there is no subclass relations among the classes in ancestors_of_associahedron
. So I think it is faster to make that a set
object and test
for typ1 in mro: if typ1 in ancestors_of_associahedron: return typ1(parent, Vrep, Hrep, **kwds)
as set
containment check is much faster and these classes are likely to be higher in the MRO. It also has a side effect of making all of these classes run in the same time. For example, imagine if you are looking for a Polyhedron_polymake
, that means it has to check the through the entire MRO 4 times (and a bit more to actually find it). So this could become really expensive if you create lots of (temporary) associahedra.
comment:14 Changed 2 years ago by
 Branch changed from public/25183 to public/25183reb
 Commit changed from 0e892e7019001400faf0c3cfed542fffd3ac7227 to d9083b70195aafacf95eb991e21099136101ce3d
comment:15 Changed 2 years ago by
Changed to order of iteration, such that it only runs once through mro now.
comment:16 Changed 2 years ago by
 Milestone changed from sage8.9 to sage9.0
 Reviewers changed from JeanPhilippe Labbé to JeanPhilippe Labbé, Travis Scrimshaw
 Status changed from needs_review to positive_review
Thanks. LGTM.
comment:17 Changed 2 years ago by
 Branch changed from public/25183reb to d9083b70195aafacf95eb991e21099136101ce3d
 Resolution set to fixed
 Status changed from positive_review to closed
I think I took care of it in #27798.